Core I7 3rd Gen
When looking at a new processor for your PC, you will likely compare processors from Intel and AMD. Intel's most popular processors in the desktop world are the Core i3, i5, and i7 product lines. The Core i3 is entry level, and Core i7 processors are the more powerful hyper-threaded quad-core options.Depending on your requirements, or if you need a faster and more capable CPU, you may want to go for an i5 or an i7. If you're on a budget, Core i3 may be your best option.That's it, right? Unfortunately not.
Buy Dell Latitude E6330 (I78320W7PFS) Laptop (Core i7 3rd Gen/8 GB/320 GB/Windows 7) online at best price in India. Check full specification of Dell Latitude E6330 (I78320W7PFS) Laptop (Core i7 3rd Gen/8 GB/320 GB/Windows 7) with its features, reviews & comparison at Gadgets Now. Depends on what you are going to do with your processor and what device (PC/Laptop) it is for. Laptop:. 4th gens have a overall lesser power consumption than third, so that might be an driving factor if you are purchasing an Laptop.
Intel's model numbers can be rather confusing. For example, do you know the difference between a Core i5-6400 and an i5-7600K?
Not only are there tiers and different processor models, but also generations.Here are some detail that should help you decide between the main families of processors, as well as the specific chips within each tier. What do the numbers mean? It's actually really easy to determine the generation a particular processor belongs to. Taking the examples above, the Core i5- 6400 is sixth generation, while the i5- 7600K is part of the most recent, seventh-gen. Simply look at the first digit in a model number, and you'll be able to tell if it's a newer or older processor.The latter three digits determine the SKU and just how powerful the processor is within its immediate product line.
The Core i5-7 600K is more advanced than the i5-7 500, for example. If you wish to go for the more capable CPUs, be sure to check the higher model numbers within a product line. It's worth noting if you're considering Intel's 7th-gen processors that they only support Windows 10.What about the K located at the end of the Core i5-7600K? That is a suffix Intel uses to show specific features the processors sport. Here's a quick list of those suffixes:. H - High-performance graphics.
K - Unlocked for overclocking. Q - Quad-core (four physical cores).
Core I7 3rd Generation Processor
T - Optimized for efficient desktop computing. U - Ultra low power, usually found on laptop processors (slower than desktop chips).This should solve the mystery of the codenames, but we always recommend double-checking processor features and specifications on store listings. Which Intel processor right for you? Now that we have the more complex processor codenames out of the way, here's a brief overview of the three processor families:. Core i3: Dual-core processors with hyper-threading.
Core i5: Quad-core processors without hyper-threading. Core i7: Quad-core processors with hyper-threading.There are a number of differences between these product lines. The Core i3 processors don't support Intel's Turbo Boost technology, for example, and they also sport less cache than their Core i5 and Core i7 counterparts. Cache is an important specification that helps the processor perform specific tasks more efficiently. Think of it as the CPU's own super-RAM.Intel's Core i3 is ideal for people who don't require much power. These processors are more affordable, and they have hyper-threading for improved performance under load but aren't powerful enough for advanced gaming or intensive applications.
This line of CPU is best suited for PCs that will be used for email, word processing, light gaming, communications and web browsing.The Core i5 takes a quad-core processor and strips out hyper-threading. This paves the way for four physical cores to handle everything Windows can throw at the component. The Core i5 family of processors is considered optimal for gaming and productivity.
They won't destroy a budget and will be more capable of handling intense tasks than Core i3s.We recommend the Core i7 series of processors for enthusiasts or for users who will be handling extreme applications, such as video and photo editing. This is the best of the best when it comes to Intel's processor offerings, sporting the most cache, the largest number of physical and virtual cores, and the most advanced integrated graphics. The Core choice is yoursShould you require a helping hand with a few examples for different PC builds, take a look at our buyer's guide for desktop processors:Tools like are also available to help make comparisons between two processors a little easier. Generally speaking, Core i3s are more affordable, Core i5s are good for most general purposes, and Core i7s are for enthusiasts and those who require maximum performance.
I have a ThinkPad T530 with an i7-3720QM and was thinking of the new T550 or W550s.My problem is that my i7-3720QM has a CPU benchmark of 8310 and the new i7-5600U has a CPU benchmark of only 4306.Other than power saving features, from a pure performance point of view, this seems like a huge step downward. And, the new 5th gen i7s are only dual-core and there are no quad cores.The W541 can come with an i7-4910MQ which has a high CPU benchmark.What am I missing???
All the new ultra-low voltage CPUs may give us great battery life but it seems to me that we have lost all high-performance computing.Comments? Ok, so first point. The older processors are faster. Correct?Next, why am I not comparing the apples and apples? These are all Intel's top line of mobile processors. 3rd gen, 4th gen, 5th gen.
In the mobile world, Intel appears to be focusing on Low Voltage processors which consume less power, generate far less heat and therefore produce laptops with much longer battery life. But for those of us who want the fastest processor short of a desktop, we seem to be SOL with the 5th gen 'U' processors.
Right now, Intel doesn't seem to have any Quad Core mobile processors and I don't know if any are in the pipeline.The fact that Lenovo's 'W'Series (aka Workstation) now has a 5600U instead of a 4910MQ says alot. Big battery life but half the horsepower of before.Again, in terms of performance only, are the new machines much slower from a CPU point of view that the old??? The older processors are faster. Correct?No, not correct. You can't make such a broad generalization.The situation is more complex.I am guessing U is for Ultrabooks. But clearly you aren't in the market for an Ultrabook.
So this new range of CPUs isn't for you. Not every CPU range is going to match your requirements.Maybe you should wait for the Intel Skylake CPU releases in a few months.The Skylake-H and Skylake-S CPU ranges are probably more what you are looking for (35 - 45W). No, not correct. You can't make such a broad generalization.The situation is more complex.I am guessing U is for Ultrabooks. But clearly you aren't in the market for an Ultrabook. So this new range of CPUs isn't for you.
Not every CPU range is going to match your requirements.Maybe you should wait for the Intel Skylake CPU releases in a few months.The Skylake-H and Skylake-S CPU ranges are probably more what you are looking for (35 - 45W).I just want to thank you for the info and ask a couple more questions. I was just in a Best Buy looking for a sleek laptop with good battery life, but I didn't want to lose performance in case I wanted to game on it and I had been out of the loop for a couple years and didn't realize their was 5th gen series out. Well, I figured there would be, but wasn't expecting just low performance, dual core, battery savers. It had such low benchmark scores compared to the 4700 mq and hq basics that I was seriously disappointed. Do you know if the Skylake CPUs are going to have quad core processors in some of their models? I am looking for one on a thin laptop, but I may very well have to settle for a 5th Gen U series I want something lightweight that last 5 or 6 hours, but has good performance. Do you know about any lightweight ultrabooks that would better fit my wants, cause I am not seeing any that fit?
I just want to thank you for the info and ask a couple more questions. I was just in a Best Buy looking for a sleek laptop with good battery life, but I didn't want to lose performance in case I wanted to game on it and I had been out of the loop for a couple years and didn't realize their was 5th gen series out. Well, I figured there would be, but wasn't expecting just low performance, dual core, battery savers. It had such low benchmark scores compared to the 4700 mq and hq basics that I was seriously disappointed.
Do you know if the Skylake CPUs are going to have quad core processors in some of their models? I am looking for one on a thin laptop, but I may very well have to settle for a 5th Gen U series I want something lightweight that last 5 or 6 hours, but has good performance. Do you know about any lightweight ultrabooks that would better fit my wants, cause I am not seeing any that fit?If your concern is gaming, then you're looking at the wrong performance benchmark. Basically, all modern CPUs are fast enough for any game.
It's the GPU that you should be looking at. Almost all Intel CPUs have integrated GPUs that are not fast enough for modern video games. So what you'll need is a dedicated graphics card.
The GT 750m is a popular one, found in many laptops. It'll do okay on most games.
Core I7 3rd Generation Processor Price In Bd
If you want something significantly faster, you'll need to buy a dedicated gaming laptop. They're usually heavy, and always expensive. I have a ThinkPad T530 with an i7-3720QM and was thinking of the new T550 or W550s.My problem is that my i7-3720QM has a CPU benchmark of 8310 and the new i7-5600U has a CPU benchmark of only 4306.Other than power saving features, from a pure performance point of view, this seems like a huge step downward. And, the new 5th gen i7s are only dual-core and there are no quad cores.The W541 can come with an i7-4910MQ which has a high CPU benchmark.What am I missing??? All the new ultra-low voltage CPUs may give us great battery life but it seems to me that we have lost all high-performance computing.Comments?One should consider the single thread rating as well. Many tasks cannot utilize more than one processor core.
From this angle of view the difference between the two processors is not that big (1830 vs 1696 ).